tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1877278742910158861.post5520041229694077031..comments2010-06-27T10:22:36.582-07:00Comments on x/=x: Implicit Folds in Haskell (for those jealous of LISP)approxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14437325118483171429noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1877278742910158861.post-51407378291914364652010-05-11T21:18:56.517-07:002010-05-11T21:18:56.517-07:00Hmm... how is FoldyCons (+) [3,4,5] better than ju...Hmm... how is FoldyCons (+) [3,4,5] better than just writing foldr1 (+) [3,4,5] in the first place?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1877278742910158861.post-18146937462026833812010-05-11T17:33:42.573-07:002010-05-11T17:33:42.573-07:00I wouldn't call it FoldyCons, as that appears ...I wouldn't call it FoldyCons, as that appears to be confusing. You're not really Cons'ing, so much as applying.<br /><br />Maybe, FoldyBuild?danlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09617013155169577134noreply@blogger.com